The phrase that echoed around the
Canberra Theatre Centre of Phantom’s opening night was “It’s
good, for an amateur production.” While the sell-out crowd were
receptive to the performance (there was a quarter of a
standing-ovation), they were just as receptive as crowds tend to be
on any other opening night. Perhaps the strengths of this production
worked against it; the necessary complexity of bump-in meant that
they only had three days in the theatre before preview (a common
amateur theatre situation, but one that kept being used as an excuse,
even in speeches by Somes and Harmon). Regardless, I enjoyed this
musical. I didn’t love it, nor did I hate it. It simply happened,
and I was there, and it was an important event for the community.
Let’s begin with what everybody has
been talking about: the professionals. Let’s be honest for a second
– they were good, but they were always going to be. It seems a
little redundant to say that Michael Cormick and Julie Goodwin were
stand-outs of this show... They’ve had the benefits that come with
years of professional training, extensive experience with the
material and, let’s call a spade a spade, professional abilities.
Since it was first announced, the public have been bombarded with how
excellent these two are. Which made them, unfortunately, victims of
their own hype in performance. I’ll make no excuses, professionals
are never critiqued worse than by amateur performers.
Michael Cormick’s Phantom was not
overly Phantom-y. In terms of balance, for every excellent moment,
there was an average one. More than anything, Cormick appeared to be
the victim of his director. Overall, Cormick’s Phantom didn’t
hold my attention. There were definite points at which he showed the
abilities of his voice, but production week appeared to have taken
its toll, particularly in Music of the Night, as there was the
tell-tale growl and occasional cough from then on. Perhaps it is the
over-hype I mentioned before, but while I enjoyed his performance, I
expected more. As one person said to me in the foyer, “The Phantom
wasn’t Phantom enough” – his presence wasn’t what it needed
to be.
Julie Goodwin’s voice is stunning,
and she fitted into the ballet chorus well. There was a believable
friendship between her Christine and Tamina Koehne-Drube’s Meg
Giry, which was delightful to watch, albeit at times in their duet
(Angel of Music) Meg seemed less of a trusted friend, more of
a dresser and awkward third wheel to the voice in Christine’s head.
Goodwin’s acting, like Cormick’s, didn’t quite seem comfortable
with the direction in places. There were moments where Christine
appeared to know exactly what was going on, which is the opposite of
her character’s reality. Christine is a pawn, first for the
Phantom, then for Raoul, and appeared too strong for either man.
David Pearson’s voice is delightful.
At times, though, it felt like he was Christine’s father, not her
fiancée. His lower register is also noticeably louder than his
higher, which made it seem that through All I Ask Of You, he
was intermittently yelling in Christine’s face. His
characterisation, however, was a new twist of the usually played
vacuous and playful Raoul, providing a Raoul who was just as
charming, dominating and often controlling as the Phantom himself.
While not exactly melt-in-your-mouth sweet, Pearson’s Raoul was the
first I’ve seen that I didn’t instinctively dislike for being
whiney and self-entitled. I’m very glad Pearson’s back in town.
Christine Wallace’s Carlotta was
vocally stunning. I don’t know who taught this woman to sing, but
sign me up. Carlotta’s trills and operatic vocal runs were spot-on,
and she never missed a note. Performance-wise, her non-singing
moments could have used a touch more “diva”, and her costumes
could have been credibly repulsively garish. Often, Carlotta was
dressed in sepia tones, which left her looking a little washed out.
Ben O'Reilly’s Piangi (edited - this role was previously miscredited) left
something to be desired. He missed many of his operatic notes in
Hannibal and others, but an operatic tenor in Canberra is hard
to find. More than that, there wasn’t really a Piangi character.
He was Carlotta’s offsider, and left it there, missing many
opportunities for physical and verbal comedy associated with being a
leading man and still subject to a diva’s whims.
As the theatre owners, Tony Falla and
Michael Moore were well cast. While still coming to terms with the
intricate timings and lyrics of the Notes scenes, they
presented the first real characters we see in the show. The
pair showed an excellent contrast in two oft-similar characters, and
at times they worked the stage better than Cormick and Goodwin.
Tamina Koehne-Drube has been becoming
more and more prolific over the last two years, and Phantom
gives us a chance to see why. She is delightfully graceful en pointe
for the ballet chorus (although she would be more so if she put her
shoulders back), clearly emotionally involved as a character, and her
classical vocal training is paying dividends. While she had a few
hard moments in her lower register, as well as some microphone
issues, she was definitely one of the best performers onstage. The
chemistry she had with not only Christine, but with Bronwyn
Sullivan’s Madame Giry was apt and believable.
Sullivan’s strict ballet mistress,
Madame Giry, was a well-acted and well-sung performance. While the
production didn’t make as much of Giry’s ability to frighten
respect from anybody she wished, be they dancer, crew or theatre
manager, she nonetheless commanded attention and used her time
onstage excellently.
Even the famous chandelier gave a
perfectly balanced performance: the drama and excitement of its crash
to the floor was balanced by jerky, awkward, inexplicable rising. The
dramatic opening chords of the show were met by an almost painful
stop-start ascension, with unnecessary pyrotechnics.
More than anything, I would say that
the show was let down by its direction. David Harmon provides us with
yet more balance issues, as for every moment of excellent direction,
there are moments of awkwardness. Every director has to put their own
spin on things, but The Phantom of the Opera (the Les Mis
of Andrew Lloyd Webber “musicals”) has certain things that need
to be done a certain way to be most effective. Free Rain’s
production demonstrates why.
While there is understandably not much
to be done with the minimal set, there were certain directorial
decisions that left Cormick in odd places for certain moments. For
example, the Phantom overheard the entirety of All I Ask Of You
(sung on the roof of the Opera house) from his comfortable seat in
Box Five which, logically, not only raises the question of how he
physically heard any of what just happened, but why the police, when
searching for the Phantom (a murder having just taken place and all),
didn’t think to look in his favourite seat?
Similarly, Music of the Night is a slow, gradual build up of seductive power, which should make anybody who hears it crack a theatre-boner for the Phantom. The Phantom has rehearsed and rehearsed this moment for years, plotting his seduction of Christine, where he’ll stand, where he’ll put her when she faints etc. Every detail is measured and precise, for the ultimate theatrical gain. Cormick’s Phantom is all over the stage for this number, his body doing the work that his voice should be. There are only so many times we can believe that the Phantom can wave his hand over Christine’s head and she’ll pirouette. The clear planning of All I Ask of You is then supposed to provide a dramatic difference to Pandemonium, in which the Phantom’s plan has been ruined and he’s hurriedly, desperately ad-libbing a way to fix his problem (the kidnapping of Christine etc). Phantom seemed more prepared for this than anything else in the show.
Pandemonium also sees the threat of killing Raoul (a man who apparently thinks his eyes are at chin level, judging by where he held his hand, despite MANY warnings from the Giry women)... The Phantom pulls a rope, which lifts Raoul’s noose, choking him. Then, without any explanation, the Phantom lets go and walks around the stage, particularly to Christine, while Raoul hangs there, feebly fiddling with noose. As Phantom hasn’t tied the other end off on anything, there is no visible explanation as to why Raoul doesn’t just pull his end of the rope down and at least relieve his airway. Obviously, there are various knots and pulley mechanisms that can explain this, but I don’t think any production can rely on assumed knowledge in an audience.
Another confusing directorial decision
was to have all of the Phantom’s asides boomed out into the theatre
space and reacted to by the other actors. While this may seem logical
as there are gaps in the script for them, it doesn’t really make
sense to have the Phantom loudly announce his plans and then for the
theatre managers and Raoul to continue as if nothing had happened.
During Il Muto, the ballet is performed facing the audience, and yet we can see a set of fly-ropes in the background. Either the Opera Populaire skimped on set, or the stage was an M.C. Escher design, in which the side of the stage is also at the back. Understandably, the corpse has to drop, and this drop has to be seen from the audience. This just shows why most productions choose to have the corpse drop into the middle of the ballet... So the audience, dancers and managers would all see it at once. Also, the dummy used as the corpse lacked human weight and therein bounced comically when it fell, like a rag-doll.
The ensemble, ballet corps and chorus members alike, sang wonderfully, but lacked any real characterisation. Oliver Baudert shone in his two initial characters, and then appeared to fade into the background (or at least out of my notice). He did, however, appear to have the only French accent in the production. If Les Mis has taught us anything, it’s that either you all do, or nobody does. Joe McGrail –Bateup’s frazzled director/conductor/repetiteur was also entertaining at times.
While this may be nit-picking, it is nit-picking from someone for whom The Phantom of the Opera was the first seen non-G&S musical. It is a passionate love of mine (and one of the two Andrew Lloyd Weber musicals I adore, although this is purely for the story). I feel that I missed a lot of the emotion and heart of the piece because I was too distracted by other things, particularly in the moments above. Those around me in the audience and foyer, I learned, suffered equally.
The design team, led by Cate Clelland
and Fiona Leach, with help from Nick Valois, Steve Galinec, Anita
Davenport and an army of others, did a tremendous job with what they
had at their disposal. Galinec and Davenport’s mausoleum and
theatre boxes not only looked the part, but stole the show (as far as
non-moving, non-explosive components were concerned). Leach’s
costumes were for the most part stunning, with occasional
anachronisms that are unavoidable without a bigger budget.
Ian Maclean’s musical direction is
superb, with excellent vocal coaching by Lloyd-Weber veteran Leisa
Keen. The band, while over-amplified, played exceptionally and the
company numbers sounded terrific.
In short, Free Rain’s Phantom
was about balance. For every good moment, there were
not-so-good moments, and the entirety of act one was upstaged by a
falling lamp. While seeing Phantom with professional
performers in the Canberra Theatre may be special, this production
struggles to be anywhere near the standard to which it claimed. It
was an excellent plan by Somes, and successful even before the cast
reached the theatre.
I can only hope that the cast and
company don’t try to rest of the laurels of selling out,
considering they would have had every seat filled regardless of the
show’s quality. A safe bet is a safe bet.
On a final, P.S-ish type note – there
were flowers and gifts for the production team, Cormick and Goodwin.
Most shows at least save that for closing night, and if you’re
going to give the leads a present, you should probably give the rest
of the cast one too. In a similar vein, I only saw leads at the
post-show VIP function, and heard rumours that everyone else had been
relegated to the green room...
Just to clarify, the opera boxes were built by Nick, painted and decorated by Ian Crocker and finishing touches by Cate, myself and Anita.
ReplyDelete'“The Phantom wasn’t Phantom enough”'
ReplyDelete'Michael Cormick’s Phantom was not overly Phantom-y.'
'Performance-wise, her non-singing moments could have used a touch more “diva”'
As an actor in no shape or form involved with this production, I cringe at this review. You should not make indulgent comments about a craft you demonstrably know little about.
'Insight-wise, this review should have been 70% more self-aware.'
For what it's worth, I consider "That Other Guy" to definitely understand the art and craft of musical theatre performance - otherwise I wouldn't have published the review.
DeleteI don't think the use of Joss-Whedon-isms is something that particularly detracts from the writing - these roles come with expectations, and, to the writer, the performers didn't match them.
Anyway... why not engage with the show, instead of picking a fight? How do you think the performers DID embody their roles, what stood out for you as an indication of strong performance?
I moderate these comments, without apology. If people want to pick fights with other people, fine, they can. Elsewhere. Here, you talk about the show. Gratuitious insults will not be published.